Those who make the statement: "The scientific question of Shakespeare’s authorship is settled. There is no room for discussion" need to read Thomas S. Kuhn „The Structure of Scientific Revolutions“ published 1962 and come to grips with the reality that all knowledge is inevitably socially constructed.- Kuhn popularized the phrase „paradigm shift“ (which he didn’t use) and gave it the meaning it has today. After Kuhn science is not an objective search for "truth" as many people believe. Instead, "normal science" is a problem solving endeavor. When it leads to anomalies that can no longer be explained within the established paradigm, crisis ensues which is resolved through the establishment of a new paradigm.
This is the case for the Stratford dogma, which causes more problems than it solves. Its widely-held prevailing concept needs a paradigm shift, a re-orientation involving the incorporation of new concepts into mainstream thought, new information seemingly contradictory or radically different from the traditional view
The paradigm shift will slowly arrive if we change from the Oxford theory to the more robust and defendable Marlowe theory...
...and the "paradigm shift" will only be achieved when the more radical view is accepted that the pen name "Shake-speare" was but one of many feigned author-names of Marlowe as the singular author (of Edward I/II /III/IV or Richard II/ III or Henry IV/V/VI).
The english Blog (first 220 entries) available as kindle E-Book
Marlowe equals Shakespeare
Buchkritik im Internet
Peter von Becker
→Zeitzeichen WDR / NDR/ SR.
Zum Bearbeiten hier klicken.