"Dear Mr. Conrad,
our man for Shakespeare here in the newsroom remains Christopher Schmidt. On him you need to contact. And if you do not get through with him, then nowhere.
Johan Schloemann "
In plain English: For me, you as an amateur, do not penetrate anyway with this silly theory .. ..
What - for God's sake - has taken these influential men so against a theory that turns out in a decade of steadily adventitious arguments to be robust , that can be defended and may advance to new horizons?