Shakespeare's obsessive referrals to a false death , to a permanent loss of name and identity and also to banishment, exile and to a life in darkness and concealment is compatible with Marlowe's life motif and trauma and should be a legitimate , because plausible working hypothesis in the Shakespeare authorship debate.
Why to this day such concepts or ways of thinking had no consequences for literary science?
Why the fertile concept of a scientific working hypothesis ("... let's assume Marlowe's death had to be faked to rescue the poetic genius life with all the consequences of unknown lasting , ie changing identities and names") was not used to tackle the Shakespeare authorship question?
Why the basic assumption of the authorship of Shakespeare as Marlowe, bodily masked by Will (Stratford) , has never been systematically examined?
Almost all of the 100 exemplary questions in the QUIZ (English ) of this Website , seemingly unsolvable, can be answered on the basis of this working hypothesis....